Writer Tamara Dean wrote an article on reducing pedestrian accidents. It contained some ideas on slowing traffic down to reduce pedestrian accidents. Here is a table of ways to reduce pedestrian accidents, with utility ratings of effectiveness vs detrimental effects. The first nine are her suggestions.
| METHOD | UT | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | DIAGRAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sidewalks | +5 | Gives pedestrians their own space | Need more right-of-way | |
| 2 | Street Trees | −2 | Can protect pedestrians from cars | Can hide pedestrians & bicycles from cars Roots can destroy pavement | |
| 3 | Roundabouts | +4 | Much safer for vehicles & pedestrians | Much more space than normal intersection Must pass all truck traffic | |
| 4 | Narrower streets | −1 | Slows traffic by reducing maneuver space | Must pass large trucks & fire equipment Not suitable for major arterials | |
| 5 | Speed bumps & humps | −4 | Slows traffic with vertical deviations Inexpensive |
Painful to passengers with back trouble
Can damage bumpers & fenders of some cars High-centers large truck frame resting on hump | |
| 6 | Chicanes | 0 | Slows traffic with horizontal deviations | Not suitable for major arterials | |
| 7 | Bulb-outs | +1 | Shorter pedestrian crossing distance | Can keep trucks from turning at intersection | |
| 8 | Center medians | +3 | Pedestrians cross fewer lanes at a time Opposite directions stop at different times Works with flashing pedestrian beacon Pedestrians cross opposite directions of traffic at different times. |
Slightly wider street | ![]() |
| 9 | Reduced speed limit | −3 | Reduces collision speed Increases maneuvering time |
Reduces fuel mileage of vehicles (see below)
Some drivers go design speed of road | |
| METHOD | UT | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | DIAGRAM | |
| 10 | Neckdowns | −1 | Only one traffic direction moves at a time | Suitable for only very minor streets | |
| 11 | Overdesign at 40 mph Sign at 30 mph | −2 | Feels safer | Drivers feel higher design speed & drive it Causes some speeding | |
| 12 | Prohibiting all turns on red | +1 | Reduces conflicts at intersection | Reduces fuel mileage of vehicles (see below) | |
| 13 | Reduced corner curb radii | −2 | Shorter paths for pedestrians to cross | Some vehicles must back up to make the turn | |
| 14 | Isolated Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon | 0 | Stops traffic for pedestrians | Stops traffic too long (25 s) for one pedestrian Pedestrians often cross before walk signal |
|
| 15 | Intersection Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon | −5 | Stops some traffic (not all) for pedestrians | Stops traffic too long (25 s) for one pedestrian Does not stop cross traffic Pedestrians often cross before walk signal Does not conform to Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices | |
| 16 | Flashing Pedestrian Beacon | +5 | Causes minimal interruption of traffic Works well with center median or island |
None | |
| 17 | Removing view blockers | +2 | Remove brush, parking, and signs to fix | Might cause owner complaints | |
| 18 | Pedestrians: educate and enforce | +3 | Knowing signal sequences helps pedestrians Pedestrians think their light is next Button does not change signal phase order |
Pedestrians do what they can to save time Pedestrians often don't wait for traffic signals Enforcement costs money | |
| 19 | Bicycles: educate and enforce | +1 | Knowing signal sequences helps cyclists Cyclists think their light is next Cyclists need to learn wrong-lane hazards |
Cyclists do anything to reduce pedaling effort Cyclists often disobey stop signs and signals Cyclists hate extra blocks for one-way streets Enforcement costs money | |
| 20 | Motorists: educate and enforce | +4 | Motorists need to learn patience | Motorists do what they can to hurry Sometimes they break the law to do so | |
| METHOD | UT | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | DIAGRAM | |
| 21 | Pedestrian & bicycle overpasses | +1 | Free-flow crossings No possibility of collision with a car |
Expense of construction and maintenance Some cross at the street to avoid steep ramps | |
| 22 | Require business signs placed at ground level | −5 | Pleases Democrat aesthetics | Hides cars, bicycles, & pedestrians from others Hides driveways from streets | |
| 23 | Two-way bicycle sidepath on one side of street | −5 | Lowest cost for separate sidepaths |
Too many conflicts at each intersection Reduced visibility of conflicting traffic |
![]() |
| 24 | One-way bicycle sidepath on each side of street | +4 | Minimizes conflicts with bikes Increased visibility of conflicting traffic This is also called "Complete Street" |
Costs more to build. Needs more right-of-way |
![]() |
| 25 | Right turn signal if right turn lane and cross left signal | +3 | Many right turns happen on Don't Walk Fewer rights during pedestrian Walk |
Costs more to install | |
| 26 | Left and right turns have their own signal phases | +2 | Crossing movements never cross paths No lefts or rights during pedestrian walk |
Passes less traffic than other methods Needs left and right turn lanes |
|
| 27 | J-turn intersection | +4 | Fewer movements at intersection Pedestrians cross fewer lanes Cross only one movement at a time |
Higher costs to build Much more right-of-way needed |
|
| 28 | Recall pedestrian phase | −2 | Keeps signals in progression Walkers don't have to push buttons |
Wastes fuel while vehicle stopped |
UT = Utility index purple line = pedestrians in crosswalk
To enlarge image, right click on image and select Open Image in New Tab
Liberals believe that driving slower always increases the fuel mileage of a motor vehicle.
As we shall see, this is not always true:
The page author regularly drove all of these cars and was able to find out the shift points:
| 2002 Bonneville | 2010 Mazda 5 | 2012 Cruze | 1957 Chevy* | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gear | Ratio | MPG | MPH | Gear | Ratio | MPG | MPH | Gear | Ratio | MPG | MPH | Phase | Ratio | MPG | MPH | |||
| 1 | 2.92 | 7.2 | 0 - 12 | 1 | 3.62 | 5.6 | 0 - 12 | 1 | 4.58 | 6.2 | 0 - 12 | 1 | 2.67 | 5.6 | 0 - 22 | |||
| 2 | 1.59 | 13 | 8 - 27 | 2 | 1.92 | 9.7 | 8 - 22 | 2 | 2.96 | 9.6 | 9 - 16 | 2 | 1.60 | 9.4 | 8 - 37 | |||
| 3 | 1,00 | 21 | 26 - 44 | 3 | 1.28 | 15 | 17 - 29 | 3 | 1.91 | 15 | 14 - 24 | 3 | 1.00 | 15 | 13 - up | |||
| 4 | .705 | 30 | 41 - up | 4 | .938 | 20 | 26 - 43 | 4 | 1.44 | 20 | 21 - 29 | |||||||
| 5 | .692 | 27 | 37 - up | 5 | 1.00 | 28 | 27 - 49 | |||||||||||
| 6 | .74 | 38 | 41 - up | |||||||||||||||
* With the Turboglide transmission (rare)
This transmission stays in the highest ratio unless acceleration is actually needed.
The rear axle ratio in this car was chosen for performance, not fuel economy.
Yellow - gear at 25 mph.
Green - gear at 30 mph.
Light green - gear for both 25 and 30 mph at minimum throttle.
Many electric cars do not have transmissions and are not affected by lower speed limits.
Many hybrid cars do have transmissions and are affected by lower speed limits.
Continuously Variable Transmissions do downshift and so are affected by lower speed limits.
Making any car repeatedly stop or change speed reduces its fuel mileage.